A relatively low-budget and low-key sci-fi movie, Lola is an interesting way to riff on the whole “butterfly effect” that has featured in many a time-travel tale. I knew I had to see this as soon as I started hearing about it. I was very eager. I was optimistic. I was wrong.
It’s all about two sisters, Thomasina (Emma Appleton) and Martha (Stefanie Martini), who end up reaping the benefits of an invention, the titular LOLA, that allows them to view moments broadcast from the future. The year is 1940, war is breaking out and about to encroach upon their lives, but the girls are able to enjoy future treats such as the amazing music of David Bowie. It’s when they realise that they can use the machine to help end the war early that the sisters start to get into trouble though, setting off a chain of events that might be impossible to undo.
The feature debut from director Andrew Legge, this is perfectly in line with ideas he has been exploring for the past 15+ years, with most of his short films focusing on interesting inventions and/or manipulation of time. Having co-written this script with Angeli Macfarlane (who has a very different filmography back catalogue), Legge appears to have made his first feature without being quite up to the task. The brief runtime - it clocks in at just under 80 minutes - still feels overlong, there are numerous times when the plot feels as fragile as water-soaked paper, and the ending . . . well, I may have missed a minor detail, but it seemed to rely on a massive happy coincidence (someone tuning in to an exact moment being broadcast from one exact place).
While the opening scenes feel unique and visually striking, with everything being shown in black and white film that has been shot by amateurs making some home movies, even that soon becomes more of a chore than a delight. As later footage starts to feel a bit cleaner, and less authentic, viewers may start to wonder why Legge didn’t mix in some various stylistic choices.
Appleton and Martini both do fine in their roles, I guess, but it is hard to appreciate them as their characters are forced to change so severely between the start and end of the film. Neither are given quite enough to work with, and the film becomes weaker when they start to spend less time together (which happens far too early in the runtime). Rory Fleck Byrne plays a main supporting character, but he is allowed to show all the personality of a postage stamp, which makes me reticent to compliment or condemn his performance. He’s not very good, but he’s even more hampered by the material than either of the leads.
I still admire what Legge tried to do here, and I wouldn’t be averse to him trying again, perhaps with much more time spent on the script and an idea of how to subtly move from the crudity of the “amateur footage” to a more polished style underlining the unfolding horror of the second half. This doesn’t work as well as it should, but I will always give more kudos to an interesting failure than a lazy cash-grab. Lola didn’t work for me, falling apart quite quickly after an impressive start, but it’s certainly an interesting failure.
4/10
If you have enjoyed this, or any other, review on the blog then do consider the following ways to show your appreciation. A subscription/follow costs nothing.
It also costs nothing to like/subscribe to the YouTube channel attached to the podcast I am part of - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCErkxBO0xds5qd_rhjFgDmA
Or you may have a couple of quid to throw at me, in Ko-fi form - https://ko-fi.com/kevinmatthews
Or Amazon is nice at this time of year - https://www.amazon.co.uk/hz/wishlist/ls/Y1ZUCB13HLJD?ref_=wl_share
No comments:
Post a Comment