Showing posts with label sam groom. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sam groom. Show all posts

Tuesday, 8 March 2022

Deadly Eyes (1982)

Poor James Herbert. Not only was he never truly given the recognition he deserved for his writing, in my view, but he also saw his material adapted into movies that ranged from the awful to the dull, to the entertainingly bad. Deadly Eyes, an adaptation of "The Rats", falls into the latter category, although I'll admit that I'm loathe to consider it actually bad.

The basic premise is simple. A load of contaminated grain leads to large, killer rats, and it's eventually up to a school teacher, Paul Harris (Sam Groom), and a health inspector, Kelly Leonard (Sara Botsford), to save the day. They might have some assistance from Dr. Louis Spenser (Cec Linder), an expert in rats who doesn't realise the full extent of the problem, but they'll struggle to keep themselves safe from the overgrown, deadly, rodents.

Adapting the hugely successful novel by Herbert seems like a no-brainer, especially in the early 1980s, when practical effects and a certain less restrained approach to getting wild antics on film would make this a more exciting prospect. But it's odd that this was given to Robert Clouse, a director best known for his work in martial arts movies (including a contender for the greatest of all time, and certainly the most iconic Bruce Lee movie, Enter The Dragon). Clouse had given us killer animals before (The Pack in 1977), and perhaps his work with dogs made him a strong contender here - as the large rats were depicted by Daschunds in rat costumes. He still feels like an odd fit though, with the material being ripe for a movie adaptation that could pile on the grisliness at every opportunity.

The script, based on an earlier treatment by Lonon F. Smith, is credited to Charles H. Eglee. It's certainly better than his first feature script (Piranha II: The Spawning), but that isn't really saying much. It's obvious, however, that this is a film that would have been massively improved by better special effects and some extra gore gags. Although the plotting is basic, and a bit laughable in places, it's really not often that far removed from the entertainingly brisk source material.

It's also a shame that the film isn't cast better. Groom gives a performance that is only slightly better than his turn in Deadly Games (at least there was a double-bill of Deadly films for him in 1982). Botsford tries her best, but she's often stuck playing second fiddle to Groom's character. Linder is the typical and reliable voice providing viewers with some extra facts, and a potential solution to the problem, and he plays his part well, and the other memorable character is Trudy White, played well by Lisa Langlois. Trudy is a student who has a crush on Mr. Harris, and Langlois is enjoyably coquettish and sweet in her role.

By most standard ways of judging such things, Deadly Eyes isn't a good film. It's not a good horror film. It's not a great adaptation of a fantastic book. And yet . . . it kind of is. It doesn't do enough to make the costume-wearing Daschunds convincing, nor does it do enough to be classed as one of the better directorial efforts from Clouse, but it does enough to entertain people who want something silly and undemanding.

6/10

If you have enjoyed this, or any other, review on the blog then do consider the following ways to show your appreciation. A subscription/follow costs nothing.
It also costs nothing to like/subscribe to the YouTube channel attached to the podcast I am part of - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCErkxBO0xds5qd_rhjFgDmA
Or you may have a couple of quid to throw at me, in Ko-fi form - https://ko-fi.com/kevinmatthews

Thursday, 24 February 2022

Deadly Games (1982)

Sometimes your instincts steer you right and sometimes they steer you wrong. And sometimes you aren’t quite sure about the end result. That happened to me with Deadly Games, a film released onto shiny disc format that, much like my says of browsing in the video stores, drew me in with an intriguing cover design.

The plot is very simple. A masked killer is picking off women in a small town. He also seems to spend a lot of his time playing a home-made board game that can help direct his urges (I guess). Can Roger (a police officer, played by Sam Groom) and Keegan (Jo Ann Harris) catch the killer before it is too late, and before Keegan suffers the same fate as her sister? And is it anything to do with the strange Billy Owens (Steve Railsback)?

With some gratuitous nudity early on, and a couple of impressive and deadly set-pieces interspersed throughout the runtime, Deadly Games is certainly a film that most slasher movie fans will want to check out at least once. Whether it is worth a repeat viewing, however, is a different matter entirely. There’s something worthwhile here, an attempt to play by the rules while also toying with viewers, but there are also numerous scenes that have characters chatting to one another in a way that feels like it is just being done to pad out the runtime.

Writer-director Scott Mansfield doesn’t have much in his filmography at all, and this was his first film, but he shows a certain degree of competence when it comes to a few of the more memorable moments. There’s a swimming pool scene here that ranks up there alongside the best in the genre, for my money, and it is clear that Mansfield tries to make the most out of what he has available to him. If only Mansfield the writer was as good as Mansfield the director, this could have been a minor classic of the sub-genre.

Harris is a fine leading lady, although she’s weighed down by the weaker performance from Groom. Railsback does just fine, despite the limitations of his role, and certainly adds value to genre fans. Elsewhere, the cast is eclectic enough to include Colleen Camp, Dick Butkus, Denise Galik, Saul Sindell, and many others. Very few people are doing their best work, but most of them are just fine for what the movie is.

A mixed bag of good and bad, with most of the bad coming from the script, what you have here is a lesser slasher movie that has enough curiosity value, and strangeness, to make it worth your time.

6/10

If you have enjoyed this, or any other, review on the blog then do consider the following ways to show your appreciation. A subscription/follow costs nothing.
It also costs nothing to like/subscribe to the YouTube channel attached to the podcast I am part of - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCErkxBO0xds5qd_rhjFgDmA
Or you may have a couple of quid to throw at me, in Ko-fi form - https://ko-fi.com/kevinmatthews