Showing posts with label franc ashman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label franc ashman. Show all posts

Tuesday, 25 October 2022

Matriarch (2022)

If people know me at all, either from my reviews or from conversations we have had, then they will know that I have always pushed back against the dangerous mottos that push family ahead of everything else. Blood may be thicker than water, but both substances can be so toxic that they cause you physical harm. “You can choose your friends, but you can’t choose your family” is just complete nonsense. You can decide who you want to keep close to you, and you can make a family unit from good friends. Arguably worse than all of this stuff, and arguably even more harmful, are all of the little sayings, and Disneyfied brainwashings, that place every mother on a pedestal. Whether it is “mother knows best” or “others can come and go, but your mum is always your mum”, I heartily disagree. Being the son of an abusive alcoholic will colour your views on these things.

Matriarch is a dark, but not entirely unfunny, horror movie from writer-director Ben Steiner, making his feature debut, and it asks viewers to accept an increasingly ridiculous premise that actually works really well in showing how people will put up with a lot of abuse and (micro)aggression over the years just because they have been acclimatized to it by a family unit that has decided upon the overall environment for their upbringing.

Jemima Rooper plays Laura, a young woman hurtling off the rails so quickly, and so seriously, that she ends up heading to the last place she ever thought she would return to. Her family home. Reuniting with her mother, Celia (Kate Dickie), Laura soon starts to suspect that she has made a big mistake. Old wounds are still very easily re-opened, things feel very much like as if they haven’t changed much, and her mother looks a LOT younger than they should. What is going on? Is there something strange happening, or has Laura misremembered major portions of her childhood, perhaps replacing imagery in her drink/drug-addled brain that she is now struggling to correct?

A film that would make a very interesting companion piece to Men, I keep joking that this could have easily been titled #notallmums, Matriarch is a challenging and bravura piece of work. Partly a cold psychological horror, partly a Cronenbergian journey through a womb of darkness, Stein crafts everything nicely in service to a final act that brings everything together beautifully, but will also be far too “out there” for some viewers. He also gets a bonus point for giving the lead character one of the best last lines I can think of from the past decade or two.

Rooper and Dickie are both superb in their roles, although they are playing their characters in a way that amplifies their strain and strangeness, like the fish having a mad turn in an aquarium without considering the humans watching it, spectators who are unable to comprehend whatever is motivating the temporary madness. Sarah Paul and Franc Ashman also do well, and there are other supporting cast members do very good work, but the heart of the film is, obviously, the mother-daughter relationship (lack of relationship?). Rooper and Dickie not only do well in their individual scenes, but excel in scenes that show them “locking horns” and easily finding the weak spots to attack every time tempers start to rise.

Not a film to recommend to people who like their horror to be safer, and to feel more comfortingly familiar, Matriarch is a dark and fantastical way to look at a very real, sadly all-too-common, problem for many. I encourage people to give it a go, but it will certainly prove divisive. If you like it then you can try explaining it to others. If you dislike it then, well, mum’s the word.

8/10

If you have enjoyed this, or any other, review on the blog then do consider the following ways to show your appreciation. A subscription/follow costs nothing.
It also costs nothing to like/subscribe to the YouTube channel attached to the podcast I am part of - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCErkxBO0xds5qd_rhjFgDmA
Or you may have a couple of quid to throw at me, in Ko-fi form - https://ko-fi.com/kevinmatthews

Sunday, 11 September 2022

Netflix And Chill: I Came By (2022)

Directed by Babak Anvari, who also gave us the excellent Under The Shadow (AND the very enjoyable Wounds), I Came By is a slick and intermittently enjoyable thriller, based on a story by Anvari and written by Namsi Khan. It has one problem, but that problem is enough to unsettle the whole thing, sadly, and I'll get to it soon enough.

George MacKay is Toby Nealey, a young graffiti artist who enjoys spending his time breaking into the homes of the rich and powerful, tagging their walls with the message of "I came by", and proudly watching his work appear on local news. He's helped in his endeavours by Jay (Percelle Ascott), but the two part ways when Jay finds out that he is about to be a dad. Determined not to stop his spray-painting protests, Toby ends up in the home of Hector Blake (Hugh Bonneville), a retired judge. Blake is still very friendly with people high up in the local police force, and he's the sort of person you expect to be a pillar of the community. But he also has a very dark secret, one that leaves Toby with a hell of a dilemma. This also drags his mother, Lizzie (Kelly Macdonald), into things, despite the fact that she has previously been unaware of Toby's graffiti campaign.

MacKay is okay in his role, although his performance is sorely weighed down by an accent that seems to have been taught to him by Ali G. Ascott is also okay in his role, although his performance is slightly weighed down by the script. Macdonald is in the same boat as Ascott, but she does slightly better, as you might expect from Macdonald. The star is Bonneville though, playing the villain of the piece with aplomb. Always generally maintaining an air of composure and civility, Bonneville's character is all the more fun because of his confidence. Whatever he may or may not be up to, he acts like someone who knows they will never have to worry about receiving any punishment.

In amongst the standard thriller moments, and they're often moments that we've seen in many other movies, there are some interesting ideas in here about class, about the futility of protesting with gestures that aren't backed up by actions, and the danger of self-doubt and procrastination just because you view yourself as someone unable to effect ANY change.

I did mention that one big problem though, the one that unsettles the whole film, and I'm sure you're all dying to know what that is. There's no central protagonist. A film like this needs a central protagonist, but we don't get that. I am sure Khan and Anvari thought they were making the film even more interesting, it's certainly an unusual approach, but it just ends up distancing viewers from the onscreen events. It's hard to care for anyone when you realise they may disappear from the plot at any time, only to then be replaced by a less interesting character given the nominal lead role for a while.

I can easily imagine people liking this quite a bit more than I did, but I wouldn't be surprised if many felt the same way. That one big problem is a BIG problem, and even people not thinking about it consciously may well get to the end of the film and wonder why they never felt fully engaged with the plot. I couldn't bring myself to recommend it, unless you can dismiss the rest of the movie and just enjoy the fantastic turn from Bonneville.

4/10

If you have enjoyed this, or any other, review on the blog then do consider the following ways to show your appreciation. A subscription/follow costs nothing.
It also costs nothing to like/subscribe to the YouTube channel attached to the podcast I am part of - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCErkxBO0xds5qd_rhjFgDmA
Or you may have a couple of quid to throw at me, in Ko-fi form - https://ko-fi.com/kevinmatthews