Thursday, 17 September 2020

Split Second (1992)

Director Tony Maylam has two main features worth checking out. One is The Burning (the slasher classic), the other one is this. What could have been an interesting buddy cop thriller, with a dark heart, instead ends up being a bit too murky throughout, and clumsily written. Which doesn’t mean there is no fun to be had here. And I will maintain until my dying day that this feels very much like a movie adaptation of the James Herbert novel, Moon. 

Rutger Hauer is Harley Stone, a cop with a gritty attitude, a big gun, and a psychic link to a crazed killer (someone who likes to rip out hearts and then take a bite out of them). He is partnered up with Detective Dick Durkin (Neil Duncan), a more by the book kind of cop, of course. As the killer keeps trying to lure Stone to him, those around him end up in danger. He already lost his partner, and extra guilt comes from the fact that he was having an affair with his partner’s wife, Michelle (Kim Cattrall).

A really strange hybrid of elements, Split Second is perhaps most frustrating because it never fully settles on what it wants to be. A cop flick? A dark thriller? A full-on horror movie? It ends up being none of those things, yet it also amuses and entertains as it works with elements from all of them. 

Maylam directs with competence, but contributes to the lack of focus inherent in the messy script from Gary Scott Thompson. The waterlogged future UK setting could have been a great feature, but it is just as wasted as every other part of the plot.

Thankfully, Hauer helps to elevate everything with the power of Hauer. He spouts numerous lines of absolute nonsense, grizzled and single-minded as he wanders through the city on the investigation that defines his entire character. Duncan is nowhere near as much fun, but his differing style works well opposite Hauer’s driven mania. Cattrall is as welcome an addition as she usually is, and there are good little turns from Alun Armstrong, Pete Postlethwaite, Ian Dury, and Michael J. Pollard. 

I have never loved Split Second, something I always found surprising. But I have also never hated it either. That isn’t surprising, mainly because I cannot think of any film starring Hauer that I have strongly disliked. Give it a watch, it’s adequate b-movie fare. Just remember that it is a lower-tier Rutger Hauer movie.

5/10

https://ko-fi.com/kevinmatthews




3 comments:

  1. Just watched this for the first time and couldn't agree with you more. It's a movie that is packed to the (wait for it) gills with potential and ends up being quirky and generic at the same time. What was even the point of the whole rising tides/climate change plot device? They did so little with it.

    As I was watching, I literally said out loud to myself, "When did Rutger stop caring about his career?" It's amazing to me that this was only 6 years after his *amazing* turn in The Hitcher, which seems like it might have been his last good leading role (though I am certainly no Hauer completist and in no great hurry to become one).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I definitely recommend Wedlock, which I think you probably HAVE already seen, and I have heard much more praise for his earlier work with Paul Verhoeven (but have yet to watch those myself).

      Delete
  2. Also, how ticked off do you think the director was when he saw the poster art that showed off the monster front and center after he spent the entire movie trying to hide it?

    ReplyDelete