Showing posts with label shaun benson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label shaun benson. Show all posts

Saturday, 19 November 2022

Shudder Saturday: Slash/Back (2022)

The directorial feature debut from Nyla Innuksuk, who also co-wrote the screenplay with Ryan Cavan, Slash/Back is a fun film that benefits from a central cast of great young talent. It's just a shame that it's not all as well executed as it could be, but I will get to that soon enough.

Set in Panhnirtung, an Inuit hamlet in the Qikiqtaaluk region of Nunavut, itself a part of Canada, this is the tale of some young girls banding together to face an alien menace. The two nominal leads are Maika (Tasiana Shirley) and Uki (Nalajoss Ellsworth), but their group also includes Leena (Chelsea Prusky), Jesse (Alexis Wolfe), and Aju (Frankie Vincent-Wolfe). A mix of ages and interests means some tension between the girls, whether it's about a boy that more than one of them is attracted to or being tasked wih caring for a sibling. They all have to work together, however, when an alien invades their small community, the timing especially inconvenient while almost every adult seems to be away at some local dance.

If this film didn't have such winning performances from the leads, as well as some excellent special effects throughout, then it wouldn't be getting some of the praise that I've been seeing it receive recently. Cavan and Innuksuk have written something that shows, at best, a good does of naiveté and, at worst, a lack of ability or care. First of all, getting almost every adult out of the way feels like a bit of a stretch, although it may not seem that way to people who have grown up in such a small, tight-knit, community. Second, the actions of the alien creature(s) seems completely randomised, viewers being shown that it can kill a man in a second, but doesn't act so dangerously when facing the retaliation of young girls. Third, there's no genuine tension here. It all disappears when the alien becomes known to our leads, which is surely the opposite of how this should play out.

There are also choices made with the supporting performances, as well as the audio mix, that feel very odd, with the more bizarre elements of the film being reacted to in a way that just feels far too calm and low-key. The first main set-piece aside, none of the action feels exciting or visceral enough, and the final face-off is a proper anti-climax, considering how many different directions this could have gone in.

That cast though, Innuksuk needs to thank their lucky stars that they got that cast in place. All of the youngsters are good, all have a certain screen presence, but Shirley and Ellsworth give the kind of performances that you suspect/hope will signify the start of a lengthy career in the acting world. Shaun Benson is the best of the adults, playing a horrible local policeman, Officer Lefebvre, who turns into an even bigger threat when the girls most need help.

Other things the film gets right are some enjoyably unsettling visuals, one of the best scores/soundtracks I have heard in some time (credit due to Michael Brook and The Halluci Nation there), and a nice look at the conflicting feelings of a generation encouraged to embrace their heritage, which they view as weighty anchors, while they are experiencing the standard teenage desire for more freedom.

Slash/Back isn't a bad film, and people should have fun if they decide to give it 86 minutes of their time, but it's a close call. In fact, it's much closer than it should be, and I have to put the blame for that on director Nyla Innuksuk. It will be interesting to see how much they improve by the time they make their sophomore feature.

6/10

If you have enjoyed this, or any other, review on the blog then do consider the following ways to show your appreciation. A subscription/follow costs nothing.
It also costs nothing to like/subscribe to the YouTube channel attached to the podcast I am part of - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCErkxBO0xds5qd_rhjFgDmA
Or you may have a couple of quid to throw at me, in Ko-fi form - https://ko-fi.com/kevinmatthews

Wednesday, 7 February 2018

Arq (2016)

I do like a good bit of time trickery in movies. Time travel and timeloops usually do enough to keep me thinking and entertained throughout, which is why I knew it was only a matter of time (no pun intended) until I gave ARQ a watch.

Robbie Amell and Rachael Taylor play Renton and Hannah, two people who wake up just as their house is being invaded by people. We quickly learn that the invaders are after "scrips", and maybe some food, but Renton suspects that they're after something else, a machine that will benefit a company he doesn't want to get their hands on it. And that same machine ends up causing a time loop, which is very handy when Renton is killed . . . and then wakes up again just as the house is being invaded. Certain things play out the same way while certain other things start to be changed by the actions of the characters. Sometimes they remember how everything plays out, sometimes they don't.

It's a decent enough premise at the heart of the movie, and I would say the same about most films featuring a timeloop, but writer-director Tony Elliott fumbles things when it comes to the bigger picture. Each iteration is freshened up by twists and developments, including just how many people start to remember what has happened to them before, but he throws too much in the mix when trying to complicate the character motivations and also hint at the bigger picture of the world outside the house.

Amell and Taylor are decent enough leads, and they do what they can to carry the film. They can't do enough, however, when weighed down by the vagueness of the script, which only starts to nail down some of the finer details in the second half, and the nondescript nature of most of the supporting cast members. Shaun Benson, Adam Butcher, Gray Powell, and Jacob Neayem do what they're asked to do, which makes it more frustrating that they're not given decent material to work with.

Elliott does well when you consider how he tried to best utilise the budget to match the scope of his vision. It's a shame that he doesn't do as well when keeping the events and characters in order for viewers to keep track of. Not that the film is incoherent. It just doesn't have enough indicators that most films of this type usually use to help viewers track any locked events and any changes.

There's still enough here to make this an enjoyable sci-fi thriller, especially if you like time trickery in your movies as much as I do. It's just a shame that it isn't a bit better, in terms of the characterisations and plotting. Not the worst way to spend 90 minutes but, unlike the main characters, I won't be repeating the experience.

6/10

If you have enjoyed this, or any other, review on the blog then do consider the following ways to show your appreciation. A subscription/follow costs nothing.
It also costs nothing to like/subscribe to the YouTube channel attached to the podcast I am part of - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCErkxBO0xds5qd_rhjFgDmA
Or you may have a couple of quid to throw at me, in Ko-fi form - https://ko-fi.com/kevinmatthews