Showing posts with label peter stickles. Show all posts
Showing posts with label peter stickles. Show all posts

Monday, 29 November 2021

Mubi Monday: Shortbus (2006)

After making one hell of an impact with his directorial debut, Hedwig And The Angry Inch (a gloriously twisted and audacious musical), John Cameron Mitchell decided to push things much further with his second feature, Shortbus. If you're not sure whether or not this film is for you then the first 5-10 minutes should help you make up your mind. It includes some domination, someone urinating while sitting in a bath, a couple engaging in a variety of sexual positions, and a young man attempting to self-fellatio. Things get much more graphic throughout the rest of the runtime.

Sook-Yin Lee plays a relationship counselor, Sofia, who has some relationship problems of her own. She has never been able to achieve orgasm, despite trying very hard with her partner, Rob (Raphael Barker). She ends up trying to help Jamie (PJ DeBoy) and James (Paul Dawson), with the latter unable to relax enough to let his partner have penetrative sex with him, but that doesn't go too well, then leading to all of the characters spending time together in the hedonistic and liberating environment known as Shortbus. There is all manner of ways to explore your sexuality there, and Sofia also thinks she could make some more progress when she starts talking to a dominatrix (Severin, played by Lindsay Beamish). All of these characters are people that viewers already saw during the opening scenes, but there are more people to be added into the mix as various plot strands play out, intertwine, and continue to wind their way back to the dark and sweaty body-melding environment known as Shortbus.

Very graphic throughout, and Mitchell has stated that he sees no reason to use sex onscreen as he would use any other tool from his box of tricks, Shortbus will certainly cause the prudish to have palpatations for every minute that they try to endure. A lot of the sex scenes explore homosexuality and various kinks, from the s/d dynamic to self-pleasure, from voyeurism to group sex, and ,while it may seem overdone and gratuitous, the identity of the film is made up of these various acts. It's a collage of intertwined limbs and sexual organs, focusing on characters who are driven to distraction by their own sexual problems.

The performances are a mixed bag, with some actors perhaps being picked more for their willingness to have unsimulated sex onscreen than their acting ability, but the women generally do a much better job than the men. Lee is a great lynchpin, and her quest for an orgasm will resonate with many female viewers who may have found themselves at least temporarily as frustrated as she becomes, and Beamish is the kind of dominatrix who does her job well, but can also allow herself to soften slightly when in the right company. 

An interesting step along from his feature debut, Mitchell definitely sets himself out as someone happy to explore all aspects of sexuality with a non-judging and unflinching approach. The material deserves that, and there still aren't enough people delivering these stories in this way, but I personally preferred the stylistic and tonal decisions made in Hedwig And The Angry Inch. There's no problem with that, and it just means that I wasn't the target audience here. But I wasn't necessarily the target audience for his debut feature either, yet that one managed to win me over within a very short space of time.

I appreciate what was done here, and the whole things has an easygoing vibe that you would feel if you yourself were wandering into Shortbus, but it ultimately didn't really do enough with the script and cast to make the journey feel as worthwhile as I hoped it would be.

5/10

If you have enjoyed this, or any other, review on the blog then do consider the following ways to show your appreciation. A subscription/follow costs nothing. All links are HERE.
It also costs nothing to like/subscribe to the YouTube channel attached to the podcast I am part of - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCErkxBO0xds5qd_rhjFgDmA
Or you may have a couple of quid to throw at me, in Ko-fi form - https://ko-fi.com/kevinmatthews

Thursday, 1 July 2021

Zoombies 2 (2019)

I have ended up watching a film that, yet again, makes me wonder why I do these things to myself. I watched Zoombies a few years ago and didn't bother with the sequel. Why would I? I hadn't enjoyed Zoombies. But then I saw the trailer for the upcoming Aquarium Of The Dead, a film I discovered was the third instalment of what has now become a loose trilogy of zombie animal movies. That trailer sold me on the potential of the daffy premise, so I knew I had to watch Zoombies 2, if only to satisfy my own OCD movie-viewing habits.

All you need to know about this film is that it is very similar to the first film, with the main difference this time around being that the animals affected are in a large wildlife park. The main characters are a bunch of poachers and a ranger, Brooke Sullivan (played by Erica Sturdefant). As things start to look bleak for everyone involved, it becomes vital to figure out a cure for the zombiefication and stop the epidemic spreading throughout the rest of the world.

Writer Scotty Mullen and director Glenn Miller both return to deliver another load of animal mayhem, having obviously kept everyone happy enough with their work in the first film. Well, they must have kept everyone behind the camera happy, but I doubt many other viewers actually enjoyed the end result much more than I did. Anyway, they did what was asked of them, and they repeat the formula here, with the same level of quality present in the final product.

Things start well enough. There's a zombie porcupine that I thought was signifying a much more enjoyable movie, one with more humour throughout it. That wasn't to be, however, and things soon become a tiresome sequence of dull conversations between main characters and horrible CGI depicting animals on the rampage. Those animals may be eclectic enough to stave off boredom for a while - that porcupine, a meerkat, a crocodile, a tiger, a hippopotamus, some rhinos, etc - but the special effects are so clumsy and awful that any animal attack sequences become more of a pain than a simple pleasure.

I'm not going to be as harsh on the cast as I am on the script, special effects, and uninspired direction. Sturdefant is okay in her role, and she has a number of scenes working well with the equally-capable Terra Lyons (one of the main poachers, and someone who has maybe inadvertently started an animal apocalypse). Nobody else makes much of an impression, with Jonathon Buckley and Jarrid Masse both playing very similar males who are ready to battle the wildlife, and Jumarcus Mason, Caleb Thomas, Peter Stickles, and others all looking ready to become food at any moment.

In a way, the fault ends up lying with me. I should not have expected any big step up in quality here, and the film-makers all do enough to maintain a consistent standard between the previous movie and this one. It's just that their standard falls far below mine, and that is really saying something when you consider the wide variety of cinema that I enjoy. 

3/10

If you have enjoyed this, or any other, review on the blog then do consider the following ways to show your appreciation. A subscription/follow costs nothing.
It also costs nothing to like/subscribe to the YouTube channel attached to the podcast I am part of - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCErkxBO0xds5qd_rhjFgDmA
Or you may have a couple of quid to throw at me, in Ko-fi form - https://ko-fi.com/kevinmatthews