Showing posts with label giovanna zacarias. Show all posts
Showing posts with label giovanna zacarias. Show all posts

Saturday, 7 September 2019

Shudder Saturday: Belzebuth (2017)

Belzebuth may be quite a mixed bag, and it ambitiously aims for something always just out of its reach, but there are scenes within it that rank among the most disturbing I have seen in some time. Because, for the most part, the victims are often innocent children. Children, some as young as newborn babies (in one sequence near the very start that has a woman lock herself in a hospital nursery room and then pull out a knife). It's easy to see why the film cannot maintain those high standards of terror in between the major set-pieces, but it's a shame that it fumbles with the other main ideas it has at the heart of it.

Joaquín Cosio plays Emmanuel Ritter, a cop who is still shattered from the above incident that took place soon after the birth of his child. He's further affected by a number of major incidents (a school pupil who guns down many of his fellow pupils, an attacker who takes aim at a swimming pool full of youngsters) as the authorities tell him he has to co-operate with a paranormal expert, Ivan Franco (Tate Ellington). This leads to them trying to keep a mother and child safe, learning more about the motivation of the killers, and eventually going on a journey with a tattooed and determined priest, Vasillo Canetti (Tobin Bell), who has already had a fateful encounter with these evil forces before.

The opening act of Belzebuth is the equivalent of a slap in the face. It grabs your attention, no doubt, and holds it, even while things start to fray as you head towards the halfway point. Director Emilio Portes, who co-wrote the screenplay with Luis Carlos Fuentes, knows just how much to show and how much to keep out of frame. When it comes to the horrible infanticide, we see splashes of blood, we see stains that cover the surfaces surrounding the site of a massacre, or violent acts that are cut away from at just the right moment. Adults, on the other hand, we can handle seeing violence inflicted upon them, and we often do get to see it. Portes has a good eye, and a good instinct for how to maximise the effectiveness of each scene without going too far.

Unfortunately, he doesn't have the same instinct when it comes to the writing. This is a messy script, with the film clocking in at just under two hours when it would have made a perfect 90-minute thrill ride. It's not something that people may say often, but both Portes and Fuentes would have done well to try and meld their material/ideas with the more streamlined Hollywood horror outings, figuring out how to cut out a lot of the extraneous content and build everything more effectively towards a knuckle-whitening finale. As it is, Belzebuth peaks at about the halfway point (a sequence in which the characters talk to a demon contained within a statue is an imaginative high point, a real mix of oddness and entertainment) and then just becomes a waiting game for viewers until the end credits roll.

There are other cast members involved, particularly the mother and child being kept safe, but this largely feels like a three-hander between the male leads. Ellington is the weakest of the three. He's not bad, he's just not given anything to make his character truly stand out. Cosio, on the other hand, is always giving the impression of his inner pain and turmoil while he dives further into this strange case, helped by his imposing figure. He may not be any kind of giant of a man, but he feels that way in many of his scenes. And then you have Bell, a lot of fun in a role that allows him to do his enigmatic schtick while also revealing more of the true nature of his character in the third act.

Despite it being front-loaded and a bit too muddled in places, Belzebuth is well worth your time, especially if you're after a horror movie that uses a number of familiar elements and tropes in ways that make them feel slightly different. It's just a shame that it cannot maintain the momentum it gathers during that amazing first act.

6/10

No links today. Feel free to use one on another post and shop till you drop.


Thursday, 28 April 2016

Dead By Dawn 2016: We Go On (2016)

After the madness of YellowBrickRoad, writer-directors Jesse Holland and Andy Mitton return with another impressive horror entry. While more traditional in style and aim than their debut feature, this remains something a bit different. Yet it also ladles on the atmosphere and traditional scares with a skill rarely seen at this level (not to dismiss the many fine horror movies we see every year, I am just emphasising that this is a top-tier flick with very few of the flaws we usually see associated with considerably lower budgets).

Clark Freeman plays Miles, a young man who seems to be afraid of almost everything in the world around him. Especially cars. He's one of the few people who doesn't drive. In an effort to release himself from his paralysing fears, Miles overs a large financial reward to anyone who can prove that there is something after death. He wants to take some comfort in the fact that we go on, hence the title. After wading through a large pile of kooks and deluded responses, he narrows his potential candidated down to just a few. Heading off to meet each one, with his mother (Annette O'Toole) in tow, he soon finds that there may not be any proof out there. Until it appears right under his nose. And then he might wish he hadn't started on this journey.

There are only two main problems with We Go On. First of all, Freeman isn't the best lead. He's not terrible, by any means, but it certainly takes a while to warm to his character. After some careful consideration, I concluded that this was due more to Freeman's performance than the writing, which is pretty solid throughout. The second main problem is a surprising lack of tension during some sequences. There's atmosphere and some wonderfully spooky details, and a few fantastic jump scares, but the tension dissipates once some rules are laid down and you know what can and cannot occur. That doesn't make the experience of some of the main characters any less harrowing, however, and it's a minor flaw when the rest of the actual horror content is so well handled.

As well as Freeman and O'Toole (who is wonderful, by the way, in her portrayal of a mother who will go to almost any lengths to keep her son safe and well), the cast includes John Glover in a small role (making the film an extra little treat for Smallville fans), Giovanna Zacarias as an alleged psychic plagued by the presence of spirits around her, Jay Dunn as a lovesick stranger, and Laura Heisler as a young woman trying to keep a dangerous individual out of her life. All of these people interconnnect in ways that feel nicely plausible without ever seeming too contrived, in the context of the main premise.

Holland and Mitton have certainly learned a thing or two over the past few years, although I am still also a huge fan of their debut, and We Go On uses almost every trick in the book to deliver the chills. The visuals and production design are solid, the audio moves up and down to prime you for those big scares, and the script manages to satisfy everyone while also still leaving room for some personal interpretation.

If you enjoyed some of the bigger supernatural hits from the last decade or so (The Sixth Sense, Stir Of Echoes, White Noise, etc) then you should love this one. It's up there with the very best of 'em.

If you enjoyed this review, and live in the UK, feel free to browse and buy some shit here - https://www.amazon.co.uk/

If you enjoyed this review and live in the USofA then feel free to browse and buy some shit here - http://www.amazon.com/

8/10